Shell marketing consultant quits, accusing firm of ‘extreme harms’ to surroundings | Shell

A senior safety consultant has quit working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of inflicting “excessive harms” to the atmosphere.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change dangers” and urged others within the oil and gas industry to “walk away whereas there’s still time”.

The manager, who works for the independent company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 staff. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she mentioned she had quit due to Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and fuel agency of “operating past the design limits of our planetary systems” and “not placing environmental security earlier than production”.

She stated: “Shell’s said safety ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Purpose Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable but they are utterly failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gas extraction causes excessive harms, to our local weather, to the environment and to people. And no matter they are saying, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett told the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m able to deal with the results.”

Shell was a “major shopper” of Dennett’s business, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries including oil and gasoline production. She started working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the business.

“I can not work for a company that ignores all the alarms and dismisses the dangers of climate change and ecological collapse,” she stated. “Because, opposite to Shell’s public expressions round internet zero, they aren't winding down on oil and gasoline, however planning to discover and extract much more.”

Dennett – a felony justice graduate who has spent her profession in analysis and consultancy – was impressed to stop working with Shell after watching news footage of Extinction Insurrection climate protesters urging the corporate’s staff to go away. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing venture encourages oil and gasoline workers to stroll away from the industry.

The consultant, who runs inside security surveys and is based in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to be able to stroll away and “many people working in fossil fuel companies simply aren’t so fortunate”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they really consider their imaginative and prescient for extra oil and fuel extraction secures a protected future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clear energy sector left amid stories they were annoyed at the tempo of Shell’s shift in the direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to scale back emissions will be mentioned on the meeting where the Dutch activist group Comply with This will push for the company’s policies to be extra per the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has instructed investors to reject the group’s decision that asks it to set more stringent local weather goals.

The Shell investor Royal London has stated it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief govt, Ben van Beurden, could experience an investor rebel in opposition to his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote against it.

Signal up to the each day Enterprise As we speak e-mail or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in little question, we're decided to ship on our global technique to be a internet zero company by 2050 and hundreds of our people are working exhausting to achieve this. We've set targets for the quick, medium and long term, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon vitality, though the world will nonetheless want oil and gasoline for decades to come in sectors that may’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a possible windfall tax to fund cuts to household bills after the energy business reported bumper earnings fuelled by the rise in market prices, prompting opposition parties to call on the government to herald a one-off levy.

On Monday, the most important oil and fuel producer within the North Sea spoke out against a one-off levy, arguing it might lead to the business approving fewer projects.

Harbour Energy’s chief executive, Linda Prepare dinner, informed the Monetary Occasions: “A higher tax burden will make it more challenging for brand spanking new oil and fuel initiatives to fulfill funding hurdle charges, which means fewer initiatives might be sanctioned.

“That is at a time when trade is being inspired to increase domestic UK oil and gas production and assist an orderly vitality transition.”

Harbour has informed the government it plans to invest $6bn in the North Sea over three years as business makes its case against the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had obtained a £4.6m “golden whats up” from the agency.